Tag Archives: money

Square Pulls Failed Wallet App as Troubles Mount

Square is shuttering its Square Wallet app for smartphones, a sign the mobile-payment startup is struggling to expand beyond its low-margin business of credit-card readers. Square Wallet was recently pulled from Apple’s App Store and Google Play because the app “didn’t have a lot of the utility value” for consumers, Square director Ajit Varma said in an interview with technology blog Recode.

The company will continue to support the service for customers who have already downloaded the app.In its place, Square unveiled a new mobile app called Order, designed to let customers place take-out orders from local businesses and skip the line when they arrive. “We learned from Wallet that people loved paying with their name and we knew there was more value we could add to the customer experience,” a Square spokeswoman said in an email. “We moved fast on this strategy and decided that the most efficient way to add this value was to build a new technology on a more agile platform, hence we built Square Order.”

Square is trying to appeal to more consumers and create new lines of revenue as losses in its core business of credit-card readers mount. The company charges merchants 2.75% to swipe cards through the readers, but pays about four-fifths of that money out in fees to payment networks like Visa and MasterCard.

Square recorded a loss of roughly $100 million in 2013, broader than its loss in 2012, two people familiar with the matter said last month. The closely held San Francisco company has suspended plans for a possible initial public offering and held talks about a potential sale to Google Inc. and others has losses mount.

The new Order app will eventually charge merchants a higher rate of 8% to take orders and process transactions. The service competes with a growing field of food-ordering apps that includes Grubhub and Eat24.

Square has been adding services that could eventually be more profitable than its main payments business. In the past 12 months it began Square Cash, which helps people send money to friends via email, and Square Market, a digital marketplace for small businesses. It also offers Square Register to help stores track customer data and is testing a lending program for merchants who have difficulty getting a bank loan.

via Square Pulls Failed Wallet App as Troubles Mount – Digits – WSJ Article by Douglas Macmillan.

Square Pulls Failed Wallet App as Troubles Mount – WSJ Article by Douglas Macmillian – PDF

 

Wal-Mart Dives Deeper in Banking

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is taking another step deeper into banking, rolling out a new money-transfer service that undercuts rivals including Western Union Inc. and MoneyGram International Inc. with lower and simplified fees.

The giant retailer on Thursday unveiled the new service, Walmart-2-Walmart, which will allow customers to send and receive up to $900 at a time at more than 4,000 stores. The new service applies only to payments that are sent and received in the U.S.

It aims to take a bite of the roughly $900 billion in so-called person-to-person payments made each year in the U.S., often in the form of cash or checks.
“This is a relatively easy service for Wal-Mart to develop, because it fits with the customer base that they already have, and they don’t have to spend a lot of money to create, implement or market the service,” said Ron Shevlin, a senior analyst at Aite Group, a consulting firm that specializes in the payments industry.

The service launches April 24. Wal-Mart said the service fees – $4.50 for transfers up to $50 and $9.50 for transfers up to $900 – are 50% or more below the cost of existing offerings. For its new service, Wal-Mart is partnering with Euronet Worldwide Inc.’s Ria Money Transfer subsidiary.

The money-transfer business carries substantial regulatory burdens aimed at preventing money laundering. Wal-Mart has been registered with the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network as a money-services business since 2011, according to FinCen’s public database. The move also could place Wal-Mart under the scrutiny of the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which was set up after the financial crisis to police the lending industry for abusive practices involving consumers. The CFPB already has proposed supervising nonbank providers of international money transfers. The vast majority of U.S. money transfers involve sending money overseas, according to payments experts. The U.S. is the largest sender of such payments, accounting for nearly one-quarter of the $529 billion in remittances that international migrants sent to their home countries in 2012, according to the World Bank.

In addition to competing with Western Union and MoneyGram, Wal-Mart also is taking on banks that allow their customers to transfer money to other customers. In 2011, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co. formed a joint venture to let people use their checking accounts to send each other money with an email address or cellphone number.

“The banks have failed miserably in capturing the person-to-person payments business,” said Mr. Shevlin, the payments analyst.

Walmart transfer pricing

via Wal-Mart Undercuts Rivals With New U.S. Money Transfer Service – WSJ.com – Article by Paul Ziobro & Robin Sidel.

Wal-Mart Dives Deeper in Banking – PDF

Lenders Place Their Bets on Mobile Banking

How customers rate mobile app's importance in switching banks
How customers rate mobile app’s importance in switching banks “green” – extremely important

At a time when banks are struggling with revenue and profit growth, mobile banking is emerging as a critical weapon in the battle to retain customers and cut expenses. The average cost to a lender for a mobile transaction is 10 cents, about half that of a desktop-computer transaction and far less than the $1.25 average cost of an ATM transaction, according to data from Javelin Strategy & Research.

But the spread of smartphones and tablets also presents risks for banks. Customers today expect their lenders to offer a range of mobile services, from simple functions such as balance inquires and transfers to trickier maneuvers like paying bills through photo imaging. When banks don’t deliver, some customers are walking.

All told, about 60% of smartphone or tablet users who switched banks in the fourth quarter said mobile banking was an important factor in the decision, up from 7% in the second quarter of 2010, according to data from New York-based consulting firm AlixPartners.

But as mobile-device use increases, more customers are giving it a try.”The world is quickly going mobile, and if banks aren’t there already, they’re way behind,” says Robert Meara, a senior analyst at financial-services research and consulting firm Celent.

Some mobile functions are especially appealing. While customers can view balances, transfer money and perform other functions using ordinary computers, they can deposit checks only in person or on a mobile device.”There are few things more inconvenient to banking consumers than carrying a check around and waiting to come to a branch or ATM,” Mr. Meara said.

For banks, mobile deposits are especially cost-efficient. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. recently said mobile check deposits cost the bank three cents per transaction, versus 65 cents for deposits made with a teller.

“How come this bank with the kind of weather we have in NJ and NY doesn’t have mobile deposits! I’m just going to switch banks,” wrote one user on the Google Play app store page for Santander’s U.S. mobile-banking app.

Average Cost of Bank Transactions

  • In person at a branch: $4.25
  • By phone a call center: $1.30
  • ATM: $1.25
  • Online banking: $0.19
  • Mobile banking: $0.10

via Lenders Place Their Bets on Mobile Banking – WSJ.com – Article by Saabira Chaudhuri.

Lenders Place Their Bets on Mobile Banking – PDF

How Millennials Are Pushing A Huge Shift In The Retail Banking Industry

Banking institutions are in a race to provide the newest online and mobile features to their users, as retail banking branches lose their relevance fast.

That’s because banks know that these services are how they will win over their next-generation of client. This is particularly important in the banking industry because bank customers tend to be extremely loyal. So, capturing the attention of younger adults — and, in particular, millennials — when they’re first choosing their bank can lead to a long-term market advantage.

  • More adults — of all ages — prefer paying bills online over using any other channel for performing that activity, according to a survey from Nielsen
  • And mobile is already the preferred channel for checking balances among those who are already mobile banking consumers.
  • Among millennials, checking balances, paying bills, and transferring money, were the top digital banking activities, TD Bank finds.
  • More than half of millennials are already transferring money via digital channels.

via How Millennials Are Pushing A Huge Shift In The Retail Banking Industry – Business Insider article by John Heggestuen .

BNP Paribas $9 Billion Blunder

BNP Paribas SA agreed to pay nearly $9 billion Monday and plead guilty to crimes for violating U.S. sanctions, an unprecedented settlement that includes a year-long ban on the French bank’s ability to conduct certain U.S. dollar transactions.

U.S. officials, in a Washington news conference and a Manhattan courtroom, laid out in stark terms a sophisticated and long-running scheme by BNP Paribas to disguise billions of dollars in financial transactions in violation of American sanctions against Sudan, Iran and Cuba—despite warnings by some within the firm about the legality, and morality, of the transactions.

“BNP Paribas went to really elaborate lengths to conceal prohibited transactions, cover its tracks, and deceive U.S. authorities. These actions represent a serious breach of U.S. law,” Attorney General Eric Holder said.

The bank, putting profits over the law, set up an intricate web of “satellite banks” designed to disguise its role in illicit transactions, according to the government complaint. For instance, a Sudanese bank seeking to move U.S. dollars out of Sudan transferred funds internally within a BNP satellite bank, which then transferred the money to the Sudanese bank’s “intended beneficiary” without reference to the Sudanese bank.

The $8.97 billion settlement, announced Monday by U.S. authorities, marks the largest-ever fine paid by a bank for violations of U.S. economic sanctions, and imposes other penalties rarely used against financial institutions. The settlement comes as the U.S. Justice Department is eager to prove no financial institution is “too big too jail”—or so large that punishing a bank for misconduct could hurt the broader economy.

via BNP Paribas Agrees to Pay Nearly $9 Billion to Resolve U.S. Probe – WSJ.